C++ const keyword - use liberally?(C++ const 关键字 - 随意使用?)
问题描述
In the following C++ functions:
void MyFunction(int age, House &purchased_house)
{
...
}
void MyFunction(const int age, House &purchased_house)
{
...
}
Which is better?
In both, 'age' is passed by value. I am wondering if the 'const' keyword is necessary: It seems redundant to me, but also helpful (as an extra indication the variable will not be changing).
Does anyone have any opinion as to which (if any) of the above are better?
This, IMHO, is overusing. When you say 'const int age,...' what you actually say is "you can't change even the local copy inside your function". What you do is actually make the programmer code less readable by forcing him to use another local copy when he wants to change age/pass it by non-const reference.
Any programmer should be familiar with the difference between pass by reference and pass by value just as any programmer should understand 'const'.
这篇关于C++ const 关键字 - 随意使用?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:C++ const 关键字 - 随意使用?
基础教程推荐
- 随机插入/删除的综合向量与链表基准 2022-01-01
- 如何更改 SysDateTimePick32 或 CDateTimeCtrl 的背景颜色? 2022-01-01
- 与 CAS 的原子交换(使用 gcc 同步内置函数) 2022-01-01
- 提升 ASIO 流缓冲 2021-01-01
- C++:获取传递给函数的多维数组的行大小 2021-01-01
- 将不可复制的闭包对象传递给 std::function 参数 2021-01-01
- c++ STL设置差异 2022-01-01
- 如何在 C++ 中正确使用命名空间? 2022-01-01
- 为什么我们不能使用“虚拟继承"?在 COM 中? 2022-01-01
- 如何部分禁用 cmake C/C++ 自定义编译器检查 2021-01-01
