Prevent C++11 removal of endless loops(防止 C++11 删除无限循环)
问题描述
As discussed in this question, C++11 optimizes endless loops away.
However, in embedded devices which have a single purpose, endless loops make sense and are actually quite often used. Even a completely empty while(1); is useful for a watchdog-assisted reset. Terminating but empty loops can also be useful in embedded development.
Is there an elegant way to specifically tell the compiler to not remove empty or endless loops, without disabling optimization altogether?
One of the requirements for a loop to be removed (as mentioned in that question) is that it
- does not access or modify volatile objects
So,
void wait_forever(void)
{
volatile int i = 1;
while (i) ;
}
should do the trick, although I would certainly verify this by looking at the disassembly of a program produced with your particular toolchain.
A function like this would be a good candidate for GCC's noreturn attribute as well.
void wait_forever(void) __attribute__ ((noreturn));
void wait_forever(void)
{
volatile int i = 1;
while (i) ;
}
int main(void)
{
if (something_bad_happened)
wait_forever();
}
这篇关于防止 C++11 删除无限循环的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:防止 C++11 删除无限循环
基础教程推荐
- 随机插入/删除的综合向量与链表基准 2022-01-01
- 如何部分禁用 cmake C/C++ 自定义编译器检查 2021-01-01
- 与 CAS 的原子交换(使用 gcc 同步内置函数) 2022-01-01
- c++ STL设置差异 2022-01-01
- 将不可复制的闭包对象传递给 std::function 参数 2021-01-01
- 为什么我们不能使用“虚拟继承"?在 COM 中? 2022-01-01
- 提升 ASIO 流缓冲 2021-01-01
- 如何在 C++ 中正确使用命名空间? 2022-01-01
- C++:获取传递给函数的多维数组的行大小 2021-01-01
- 如何更改 SysDateTimePick32 或 CDateTimeCtrl 的背景颜色? 2022-01-01
