AutoResetEvent, ManualResetEvent vs Monitor(AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器)
问题描述
Lets say I have to orchestrate a synchronization algorithm in .Net 3.5 SP1 and any of the synchronization primitives listed in the title fit perfectly for the task.
From a performance perspective, is any single one of those more performant than the others?
I ask this because I have been coding for a while now, but without proper knowledge on the subject.
If you can, go with Monitor. It's similar to a CRITICAL_SECTION. AutoResetEvent/ManualResetEvent might have slightly more overhead, since these can be shared by different processes, whereas a Monitor belongs to a single process.
这篇关于AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:AutoResetEvent、ManualResetEvent 与监视器
基础教程推荐
- Azure Functions:CosmosDBTrigger 未在 Visual Studio 中触发 2022-01-01
- 我应该在后面的代码中直接使用 Linq To SQL 还是使 2022-01-01
- 如何使用 .Net 检查 Active Directory 服务器是否已启动并正在运行? 2022-01-01
- WPF 模态进度窗口 2022-01-01
- C# 从 List<List<int>> 中删除重 2022-01-01
- 当值可以是对象或空数组时反序列化 JSON 2022-01-01
- .NET SerialPort DataReceived 事件未触发 2022-01-01
- Moq It.Is<>不匹配 2022-01-01
- 如果有人提交恶意软件Nuget包怎么办? 2022-01-01
- 禁止输入少量字符,例如'<'、'&a 2022-01-01
