snk vs. code signing certificate(snk 与代码签名证书)
问题描述
In my organization we use snk files with strong names assemblies. We generate the snk ourselves.
In addition we use a code signing signature on the binaries. We get the pfx from Verisign.
- What is the difference between these two processes?
- Isn't it a problem that the snk is not recevied from Verisign also?
The snk and pfx are used for two different purposes. The snk is used for strong-naming, which uses a key pair to uniquely identify an assembly. The pfx is for code signing, which is a similar process but one that is intended to prevent malicious tampering with assemblies that are distributed publicly. Using both on an assembly both strong-names AND signs it.
It's OK to generate your own SNK file as long as you keep the private key secure. The PFX file you get from Verisign allows you to sign the assembly using a key secured by a third party. This is an additional layer of security that lets users of your assembly know that it has not been tampered with.
这篇关于snk 与代码签名证书的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:snk 与代码签名证书
基础教程推荐
- Azure Functions:CosmosDBTrigger 未在 Visual Studio 中触发 2022-01-01
- 禁止输入少量字符,例如'<'、'&a 2022-01-01
- 如何使用 .Net 检查 Active Directory 服务器是否已启动并正在运行? 2022-01-01
- WPF 模态进度窗口 2022-01-01
- 如果有人提交恶意软件Nuget包怎么办? 2022-01-01
- Moq It.Is<>不匹配 2022-01-01
- .NET SerialPort DataReceived 事件未触发 2022-01-01
- C# 从 List<List<int>> 中删除重 2022-01-01
- 当值可以是对象或空数组时反序列化 JSON 2022-01-01
- 我应该在后面的代码中直接使用 Linq To SQL 还是使 2022-01-01
