Java BlockingQueue take() vs poll()(Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll())
问题描述
When consuming values from a Queue in an infinite loop -- what would be more efficient:
1) Blocking on the Queue until a value is available via take()
while (value = queue.take()) { doSomething(value); }
2) Sleeping for n milliseconds and checking if an item is available
while (true) {
if ((value = queue.poll()) != null) { doSomething(value); }
Thread.sleep(1000);
}
Blocking is likely more efficient. In the background, the thread that initially calls take() goes to sleep if there is no element available, letting other threads do whatever they need to do. The methods that add elements to the Queue will then wake up waiting threads when an element is added, so minimal time is spent checking the queue over and over again for whether an element is available.
这篇关于Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:Java BlockingQueue take() 与 poll()
基础教程推荐
- 在springboot中如何给mybatis加拦截器 2023-04-29
- JPA惰性列表上的流 2022-01-01
- 将 Windows 证书导入 Java 2022-01-01
- Java ECDSAwithSHA256 签名长度不一致 2022-01-01
- 控制台应用程序中的 Java 键盘输入解析 2022-01-01
- doFilter()是在servlet的工作完成之前还是之后执行的? 2022-01-01
- 将 double 转换为 Int,向下舍入 2022-01-01
- 在java中使用xpath和selenium解析HTML表格数据 2022-01-01
- Maven:无效的目标版本:10 2022-01-01
- 如何在相机中应用自定义滤镜 [Surfaceview 预览]. 2022-01-01
