Is it Pythonic to use list comprehensions for just side effects?(将列表推导用于副作用是 Pythonic 吗?)
问题描述
Think about a function that I'm calling for its side effects, not return values (like printing to screen, updating GUI, printing to a file, etc.).
def fun_with_side_effects(x):
...side effects...
return y
Now, is it Pythonic to use list comprehensions to call this func:
[fun_with_side_effects(x) for x in y if (...conditions...)]
Note that I don't save the list anywhere
Or should I call this func like this:
for x in y:
if (...conditions...):
fun_with_side_effects(x)
Which is better and why?
It is very anti-Pythonic to do so, and any seasoned Pythonista will give you hell over it. The intermediate list is thrown away after it is created, and it could potentially be very, very large, and therefore expensive to create.
这篇关于将列表推导用于副作用是 Pythonic 吗?的文章就介绍到这了,希望我们推荐的答案对大家有所帮助,也希望大家多多支持编程学习网!
本文标题为:将列表推导用于副作用是 Pythonic 吗?
基础教程推荐
- 尝试制作WhatsApp机器人 2022-01-01
- pyserial - 可以从线程 a 写入串行端口,是否阻塞从线程 b 读取? 2022-01-01
- 由Python将MP3转换为MIDI(类型错误:无法加载插件:mtg-Melodia:Melodia) 2022-01-01
- 与常规 dict 相比,Python manager.dict() 非常慢 2022-01-01
- 使用生成器和迭代器时 Python 多循环失败 2022-01-01
- Discord.py 缺少必需的参数 2022-01-01
- 将 x 轴刻度更改为自定义字符串 2022-01-01
- 用 Python 编写 Fortran 无格式文件 2022-01-01
- numpy float:比算术运算中内置的慢 10 倍? 2022-01-01
- 在 Celery 工作人员中捕获 Heroku SIGTERM 以优雅地关 2022-01-01
